|
|
Post by captain on Apr 3, 2017 18:23:53 GMT -5
So I'm signed up for a screening this Friday and am worried about my urine testing dirty. It will have been 4 days since I smoked. I have passed the UA screen with 5, 4, and even 3 days after smoking before but my BMI was a little lower back then. Aside from being in the sauna the next few days and drinking 2 gallons of water per day, I was wondering about alternative ods. I know people use someone else's piss for drug tests sometimes for jobs or probation. But I'm wondering if they keep results on file to test for consistency once you check in? Would they know that the piss came from two different people?
Also, I heard mixing a pack of Certo into water a few hours before a test has helped many people pass just a day after smoking. Is that soing that can be traced? One last thing: I know positive results on a check-in UA can result in a 3/6/12 month ban, but do those reussions still apply for screening results?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
mrguy
New Member
Posts: 34 
|
Post by mrguy on Apr 3, 2017 22:13:43 GMT -5
Why dont you give your body more time to detox ? Is it really worth going in knowing you might not pass ?
|
|
|
|
Post by captain on Apr 3, 2017 22:21:58 GMT -5
Because I'm getting hounded by collectors and just need to get into one study to pay everything off. The other two I've tried for this year I was picked as an alternate and got sent home. Due to the nature of my job, I often can't take a week or more to enlist in a study. This is really the only period over the next few months where I could do soing like this.
|
|
|
|
Post by puntkicker on Apr 4, 2017 0:26:02 GMT -5
Captain, according to some people on here, they will be taking a hair sample, so you may not need to worry about urine.
|
|
|
|
Post by captain on Apr 4, 2017 0:29:23 GMT -5
I don't believe they will be. I screened at about 4 weeks ago at it was a urine test. I checked in for the study and again it was urine. I passed just fine, but was unfortunately an alternate and got sent home. I previously did two other studies through and they were both using urine to test.
|
|
|
|
Post by puntkicker on Apr 4, 2017 1:08:42 GMT -5
I don't believe they will be. I screened at about 4 weeks ago at it was a urine test. I checked in for the study and again it was urine. I passed just fine, but was unfortunately an alternate and got sent home. I previously did two other studies through and they were both using urine to test. Thanks, I appreciate the update and wish you luck on getting in. If you check out this discussion area, there is a long thread about hair samples, where I get mocked for calling out someone who appeared to be a troll(not the OP, even though the OP did claim some employee named Justin confirmed it to him. Do you know any "Justin" from there? If so, maybe you can ask him and let him know people are quoting him online.  ). I havent had to try such things myself, but did watch an interesting video on soing...I think it was that "certo"...with this couple. The girl was applying for a job at Walmart after smoking with the deadbeat boyfriend. lol You sound like you probably have more experience than the normal posters here, but I hope some lurker will step up and help you out. I'm guessing you already know that it isnt just the last time you smoked that influences the outcome, but how often you were smoking before that last time. So I suppose I should ask that, to give folks a better idea on how to answer. Seriously, I'm rooting for you, and hope you'll let us know. Wait.... if you test positive, how long of a ban does put on you? I kind of agree with the other poster that you may be wise to CANCEL that day and wait for another one, unless doesn't penalize you with any sort of a ban. If it does, you could be going a lot longer than an extra few days/week without a study, you know? While some on here root against "competition", I dont want to see you banned, man. I do have a question for others though..... Being it's not uncommon for people to be drinking a ton of water before screenings(I know I do), is it possible you could just drink a ton the day of the screening and not have to worry about a "dilute" result, unlike when folks do that for probation? I actually am surprised Ive never gotten that, from the large amounts I drink beforehand(and not for the purposes of concealing anything, but I was told it would help some values that I had issues with in the past). Anyhow, I'm wondering if you could just drink so much water that it would normally yourself another couple of days? Otherwise I think MrGuy may have good advice, if they have any sort of a ban policy. |
|
|
|
Post by captain on Apr 4, 2017 2:14:40 GMT -5
Not aware of a Justin but that facility does have a rather playful staff. I wouldn't be surprised if it was someone just messing around with a subject. You're right, I should have included smoking history. Well, overall, I'm a pretty regular smoker (a bowl or two per day). Before this past week, I hadn't smoked in a month. But this past week I went through 3.5 grams.
As far as bans at , I'm not sure. I've smoked for awhile and last year after testing clean 2 weeks after smoking, I began to push the limit further and further. 10 days, 7 days, 5 days, 3 days.....was able to pass all of them w/o synthetic urine or someone else's piss (a lot of water, sauna, detox tea & supplements). My dumbass tried 1.5 days after smoking and got a 6 month timeout from Spaulding up in West Bend, WI (ban will be finished next week). As I'm a person with terrible self-control, I still pushed the limits, just less-so. At Covance in Madison, WI, I screened FIVE days after smoking and passed. Should have just left it alone but smoked anyway. Checked in SIX days after roasting a bowl and failed. Covance doesn't have set-rules but they basically meet and discuss a ban on a case-by-case basis. Since I had completed 2 studies with them, was polite, and was never late for any "events", they gave me the bare minimum of 3 months, which ends early May.
, however may play by different rules as they manufacture their own pharmaceuticals as opposed to being contracted to run the trials.
|
|
|
|
Post by 172542 on Apr 16, 2017 18:03:32 GMT -5
I screened at a couple weeks ago and the person who went over the informed consent told me, unprompted, that they will be switching to hair follicle testing. I asked when and she said they were already supposed to have switched but it is delayed and she didn't know when they will be making the switch. So it's coming eventually but hasn't happened yet.
|
|
).