|
Post by rk1117 on Dec 12, 2018 22:52:58 GMT -5
I’ve noticed since I’ve begun doing studies with PPD, they’ve become more deceptive in terms of recruitment. They say one thing over the phone or even in person, but when you get in the room it’s 100 ent bait and switch. People aren’t going to Worldwide anymore because of how bad they got with it. They tell so many lies in person and they think because we’re black and they’re white; that we are unintelligent and stupid. Don’t be fooled by the smiles, white people know that black people are inclined to believe to naturally believe and trust them.
I recommend everyone that experiences this to call IntegReview and complain about their experience. Eventually they’ll get sick of people calling and address PPD’s shadiness. Even if they’re not able to crackdown on issues of deceptiveness at recruiting, they’ll begin to investigate in other areas of the research processes and they’ll get in trouble like they did last year. Remember when they didn’t have studied for awhile, they got in trouble for being shady in other areas of the clinical research process. I heard they were letting pregnant people in or people would check in and not be pregnant and then leave pregnant. Letting people in that didn’t pass their drug screenings, etc:
IntegReview IRB 3815 S. Capital of Texas Hwy, Suite 320 Austin, TX 78704
512-326-3001
|
|
brat
Junior Member
I'm alive because of needed exp procedures as a child and glad to be healthy.
Posts: 64
|
Post by brat on Jan 9, 2019 17:04:56 GMT -5
This is not a new phenomenon for PPD and others.
I had it happen at PPD and a similar experience at Parexel. It didn’t end at the screening and extended into the study...not disclosing full risk, adding on more to the procedures (but not the stipend)..and it was for a psych med, which is already risky.
It’s the only time I agreed to participate and walked away.
|
|
|
Post by labrat1 on Jun 19, 2021 19:58:40 GMT -5
"rk1117" People getting pregnant while in the study?
That would be a major issue. I said this in a different post but I was once in a study in which a volunteer tested positive for pregnancy one week after dosing and the coordinator told me that when such a thing happens that it costs a lot of money and takes up time of the research staff and/or pharma company and it delays the progress of the study so as to keep track of the volunteer until the end of her pregnancy because it has to be determined if the experimental medication has affected the fetus. What you said makes me wonder though, if this is not a rule set-in-stone for clinics and depending on the clinic, the management or the pharma company can decide not to keep track of a volunteer who became pregnant during a study. And, sometimes in studies male volunteers are told not to impregnate anyone but if a male volunteer does impregnate someone during a study while he is not in the research facility and if it is not another female volunteer in the facility , it is harder for the clinic to find out about.
WHo knows how many deformed babies were born because some guy who was participating in a research study did not follow rules and use birth control ? No study or statistics exist on that.
|
|