franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Nov 29, 2019 20:16:21 GMT -5
is testing an investigational drug, which is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or any health authority, and is not currently available on the market. The objective of this study is to determine safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (the amount of drug absorbed into your blood stream and how your body handles the drug) and pharmacodynamics (how the drug affects your body). 480 S. Us Hwy 45 Grayslake, IL 60046 (800) 827-2778 Sponsored By: Stipend: $0 - $9540 Length of Study: 6 weeks Research Facility: In-Patient Gender: Both Age: 30 - 65 Washout Period: 42 days from Last Dosing Date to First Dosing Health Condition: *Healthy Volunteers Studies Who are you?
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Oct 15, 2019 20:18:53 GMT -5
Has the site been sold again? Will the new owners be up front about their identity? VCT lied about their involvement for years, remember. It should have been a scandal.
The "clinicalheroes" domain is registered anonymously. Fishy.
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Sept 10, 2019 12:15:54 GMT -5
Anyone know?
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Mar 1, 2019 11:09:45 GMT -5
I feel it is monitored by VCT though VCT's Chief Operating Officer--also the CEO of Study Scavenger--used to post here pretending to be a volunteer. In one post, she denied that VCT had anything to do with this site. jalr.proboards.com/post/6841/threadThese people are simply frauds. They were lying to you for years, as was Paul Clough, if only by saying nothing when people asked about the obvious partnership. Paul, incidentally, has become a furry.
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Nov 25, 2018 16:03:26 GMT -5
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Nov 22, 2018 13:13:15 GMT -5
Bit odd that the administrator has surely seen this post by now--the forum isn't exactly busy--but chooses not to respond.
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Nov 14, 2018 12:02:27 GMT -5
Someone named David Grey has taken over the account?
Did either do a post about this?
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Nov 24, 2017 10:52:52 GMT -5
Folks, thanks to Franz or Respect or someone, I had the pleasure of viewing this. It's interesting to see what kind of degenerates you're being portrayed as(and some of you likely are, just for reasons usually not related to studies lol). I could say much, much more, but would rather see what you guinea piggers have to say about this. You're the "ISIS"(false flag foe) of the clinical trial world. Do you feel as scary as they try to make you sound? The gloves aren't coming off yet, but I'm starting to get close thanks to a number of you who are riling me up with your discontent(and the few trolls who ask about this company). Clinics might do better paying us more, and/or improving the conditions/food we endure, than paying companies that sell fear. EDIT: for some reason the site isnt letting me embed video like I have in the past, so a hyperlink will do for now: www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j38uI7Qet4If you think that one's bad... www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_k-ktAgBBU
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Nov 2, 2017 15:46:42 GMT -5
bentham's info on vct/study scavenger checks out. i think it's great that paul is making some revenue from the site after doing it free for years, so i dont mind his deal with study scavenger, of which i dont know the details. but in one of their publications vct rants on about wanting to stop professional lab rats. professional lab rats, that's us. so studyscavenger is promoting itself to its own enemies, the professional lab rats, us. vct and studyscavenger are indeed run by the same people. i dont mind vct's project of trying to screen for people doing studies without washouts, it's good for us if somebody's trying to keep the industry honest. this is soing the fda could do itself if it cared, since they have all the data. Another fine old post pertaining to the recent revelation.
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Nov 2, 2017 14:45:57 GMT -5
I have a few questions--and doubts--about August's blog entry. justanotherlabrat.blogspot.com/My first question: this is a blog entry? It's clearly not: it's an advertisement. I've tried to figure out exactly who/what this company is. Apparently, it's owned by a urologist named Mitchell Efros. He has this very amusing informercial on YouTube. www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j38uI7Qet4The informercial contains footage "Courtesy of: Council for Research Subject Safety and Data Integry." Who exactly is that? Why, it's a little organization headed by... Dr Efros! www.councilforclinicalresearch.com/leadership.aspxCompare the "leadership" of this "council" with that of the company Efros' heads: www.accumedresearch.com/about-us.phpMy first scent of B.S. came from the "blog" entry, which is plainly a paid advertisement. My second, from the comments on the YouTube video. Read them. They're obviously the work of sock puppets. Click on those (all very similar) YouTube account names, too. How many of them even have any "Favorites"? What other comments have they made? Anyone else have any thoughts on this, or about this website's evidently total lack of integrity? This post was made six years ago. They've been lying to you for six years.
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Nov 2, 2017 13:32:30 GMT -5
Great ad for VCT. I promise you they show things like this to prospective clients. Things like this should be done on password-protected forums. They're free & easy to set up. This is a VCT-sponsored forum. Do you realize that? You people are idiots. Just looking at this forum for ten seconds is as draining as being in a clinic for a week. This held up. LOL
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Oct 31, 2017 9:54:21 GMT -5
I'm confused. What is Kerri connection to VCT? Any connection could be a conflict of interest as data elements across the platforms could breach confidentially and certainly pose the issue of HIPAA violations! It's pretty simple, though she seems to have a lot of trouble answering the question. www.verifiedclinicaltrials.com/management/
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Aug 28, 2017 15:12:38 GMT -5
Confirmed. Parexel is using VCT as of earlier in 2017. Say. How. You. Know. This.
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Aug 28, 2017 12:53:57 GMT -5
Correction, yes this user does have an idea how VCT works, and they stated it correctly. Yes Parexel does use VCT. They will let you screen, and they will even let you go thru a 2nd screening if needed, they will also call you and tell you all your results are good, and give a check in day and time, but when they call to confirm the day before check in, they will tell you that you have been disqualified because of verification in another study. Further more, they will disqualify you, and ban you from their database, which means they will deactivate your profile, for 6 months to a year, depending on who you talk to. It is dependent on the wash out period of the study you are trying to get into. Their board of directors has to review your profile, and it is up to them how long they ban you for. VCT is Verified Clinical Trial. You can go to their website. There is the master database of verification of all studies you have participated in, that is private information. It is verified by fingerprint and or social security number. Running a VCT check on the participants is one of the last steps Parexel does. They also ask you to verbally verify it over the phone, and it is also in their paperwork. You're an idiot posting gibberish from multiple accounts.
|
|
franz
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by franz on Aug 25, 2017 14:57:09 GMT -5
As of Aug 2017 ppd now has vet. Coming soon is covance in dallas. You were just posting that they have no studies. Now you've screened & seen VCT paperwork? No one should pay the slightest attention to these kinds of posts unless the person says "I screened on such & such date & I saw the paperwork myself."And quit repeating these things with an "I heard..." post elsewhere on this forum just because you saw this idiot's post, idiots!
|
|