|
Ekg
Jun 10, 2015 10:03:45 GMT -5
via mobile
respect likes this
Post by respect on Jun 10, 2015 10:03:45 GMT -5
I suspect a Medical Examiner is reading this post and getting an orgasm simultaneously! If thats not enough their is some inexperience Resident at Harbor Hospital waiting to take her 1st go at cracking a chest .
Next is going to be a conversation about manipulating EEG brain waves to get a retard into a study. From the sounds of it they already quite a few enlisted. If your azs can engage in conversations like this contrary to EEG readings suggesting your computer is malfunctioning the other half of your brain is still working. Just may be you can go back to school, Get a job and see if you can trick the boss into giving some overtime. Then you might be able to catch the guy on the block sneaking into your apartment because he didn't know you were coming home from work early. And stop telling people that your kid doesn't look like you because you were taking an investigational medication when he was conceived. He doesnt look like you because it wasnt your catether that was in use when the magic moment happened.
|
|
|
Post by respect on Apr 5, 2015 16:32:07 GMT -5
The doctor may ask you to probe yourself so its best you practice at home.A thorough exam is best done in the buff so as soon as you get into the exam room undress asap. To make the exam more convenient its best not to wear underwear.I hope that helps.
|
|
|
Post by respect on Mar 13, 2015 8:56:42 GMT -5
Parexel conducts screening today Black Friday March 13th! The key is you must get there before 2pm. screening do not require you to book an appointment nor can you book and appoint for an screener. Your best bet is to show up fasting and drug free to screening for a study today. Individuals who would have done no more than 3 studies in a year and none in the last one to two months stands a good chance of screening. The cut off for most studies are 55.and bmi of 30 and over are easy exclusions.
|
|
|
Post by respect on Dec 29, 2014 18:09:18 GMT -5
I guess you could. Being about the big picture and expanding opportunities around you is a much better use of your time. Showing a sponsor an opportunity to much more quickly complete a study with increase attendance at follow ups because there is pool of local subjects is a win for them and certainly a win for you. Simple recommending a clinic that meets your criteria is an indirect penalty to the less desireable clinics. If the recommendations are coming in for one clinic as oppose to next, the sponsors will start asking the right questions. For instance if you sell the sponsor on professionalism and timely payment of clinic X then where does it leave clinic Y. When clinic Y tries to sell the sponsor on the same point it will not be supported by references from individuals like you. P.S. note I'm suggesting that you be an advocate for bringing future studies to a clinics near you and in no way suggesting that a sponsor pull a study that has already been placed.
|
|
|
Post by respect on Dec 22, 2014 12:34:46 GMT -5
Does anybody have any idea if another phase 1 clinic might be ing on the old Celerion/Neptune NJ site in 2015 after Celerion closes? This rumor of them closing has been floating around for a couple of months, now it was finally confirmed this week. I've done more studies there than anywhere else and I was hoping soing else may up in its place at least comparable? As a subjects, we are used to things happening to us. We get poked, scheduled and for the unfortunate few abused. There is a favorite song of mine. Its called welcome to the 21 century. Wait we are the 21 century. Did you know you can call pharmaceutical companies and ask them what studies they have available and where possibly they might conduct studies. You might be surprised they will actually tell you and send you a thank you note for inquiring. This brings me to my next point. If you get with your friends and call the companies will get and idea where there are potential pool of subjects are to quickly execute their studies and may take the information into consideration in placement of study in a CRU in pmity to you. Take it a step further suggest clinics close to you that the study could be done. Have written down 5 reasons why the study should be done at the clinic close to your home. For example x clinic gets studies recruited and completed in short space of time. The goal is not to complain about other clinics but to emphasis what you like about the clinic you are suggesting. If pharma discovers where their subjects are coming from they can place studies and get them completed faster saving money. Some of those extra savings can be passed on to you in payment. Clinics use recruiting cost as an argument to pay subjects less. In the case of out patients and less say bad weather a clinic close to the subjects are less likely to have miss or have late time points which is good for the data and save pharma having to repeat cohorts. There are many small clinics in your area that have the bed capacity to do studies yesterday and their staff are competent and professional. How do you find these clinics? Next time you are given a consent form type in the the pharma name in clinicaltrials.gov and get the contact info in the link. The key is to do callings as a group to get the attention of the right persons. Celerion is gone but you are not forgotten. Make it happen!
|
|
|
Frontage
Dec 15, 2014 18:48:50 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by respect on Dec 15, 2014 18:48:50 GMT -5
I guess the advise got the right people attention. May b they will have Donald Trump bring some people back to Board Room. Twitter is a wonderful thing. As I said here is a wonderful place if you want therapy but if you want results you got to go big! That's all I have to say.
|
|
|
Frontage
Dec 13, 2014 8:25:13 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by respect on Dec 13, 2014 8:25:13 GMT -5
Wow
|
|
|
Post by respect on Oct 18, 2014 4:18:09 GMT -5
Don't they realize that women can easily hide things in their vaginas? Ibuprofen, iron pills, green tea, you name it. I've heard of it.
|
|
|
Post by respect on Oct 16, 2014 6:30:06 GMT -5
You said you are a college student so hopefully you don't plan to do studies for too long. Do a study somewhere else. Having to go back to Celerion is not like having to go back to school to complete your degree. There are not a lot of studies over the Holidays either as a lot of the sponsors close their books and are busy planning out the coming year. Good luck with your future career.
|
|
|
Post by respect on Sept 28, 2014 8:55:26 GMT -5
THIS Clinic took an *** whopping. They had a study that checked in every other week for 2 months. You had to have BMI of Usain Bolt- rare in the lab rat world and it would pay 4k-still not enough. Somehow the in screening it ends up being 2600 with a promise to make it the originally promised $4000. Then it became take it or leave it for 2600. Well the participants showed them and put them in a New York state of mind. On day one a worm eat a hole in that apple. There was a mutiny on the ship. Well a slealth one. Many knew that the movie sucked and that there were not going back for part 2,3 or 4. They were not going to return. The study mysteriously got placed on hold. Since the staff were New Yorkers they should have seen this coming. Or just may be they were taking the sponsor for ride on the subway. Please stand aside and let the passengers off. They probably may have figured out many will not return given the payout but guess what they get paid for hosting the study to the next train station.
|
|
|
Post by respect on Sept 27, 2014 13:27:45 GMT -5
Next time you do a study please list the study and IRB board. I will seek to investigate the members and any conflict of interest they have. If we change the way these boards operate and force them to be more inclusive for example encourage members with subject experience we can make progress. If you only pursue matters when you think you have been individually wronged then they may dismiss your attempts as being disgruntled. IRB boards should be transparent we should at least know who sit on the boards so we can hold them accountable. May be the boards could be listed on jalr just the same way clinics are listed. On investigation we may find that members have ethical conflict interest. This is an issue we can bring up with JALR founder. I heard he is very progressive.
|
|
|
Post by respect on Sept 20, 2014 22:28:09 GMT -5
This link might explain why the doctor might have rejected your professional opinion. 1.usa.gov/1qVDLuA
|
|
|
Post by respect on Sept 20, 2014 20:15:11 GMT -5
A lot of people use a stimulant like coffee to treat hypothyroidism. This condition comes with fatigue and sometimes coffee seems like the perfect remedy but simply mask the problem!
|
|
|
Post by respect on Sept 20, 2014 12:02:02 GMT -5
What research clinic fail to tell us is when lab values actually indicate a disease state. That is why it is important to have a primary doctor. By the way if you dont get-health insurance you will be penalized for it. By the nature of what you do it is bad practice not to have health insurance. The research doctor and clinic have insurance to protect if they injure you or God forbid kill you in the process.
You are more than a lab value and sometimes you have to trust the professional judgment of medical staff. This is a country with lots of opportunities so explore them! The reason why the pharmaceutical companies is a billion dollar industry is because people get sick. We are people and in economic terms we might be seen at a greater risk than the general population of getting sick due to exposure to a lot of unapproved medication. I have seen lab rats with perfect ecgs and 3 months later they have the ecgs of an 80 with a heart condition and he trying getting into a next study. He is auditioning for the medical examiner table study. The pay off is eternity. A smart family may hit the lotto by taking out a life insurance policy on the fool friendly soul.
|
|
|
Post by respect on Sept 14, 2014 19:58:45 GMT -5
When you enlist in a study you do so as a subject not as a professional. Well at least that is the view of the sponsor. But you have made some important-points. If the training of staff compromises the study that is of grave concern about the quality of data. At no point should the process become so inhumane as if you were a rodent. Constant training of staff on a subject who has to endure multiple stick may be considered brutish and if a clinic is that brutish you probable don't want to trust being transparent about the risk of a study. Since studies often contain elements of individuals of individuals that might have been disadvantaged such as being a part of a minority, people who have-less opportunities (e.g someone who has been incarcerated) we always have to be vigilant about fringe Tuskegee elements. This brings me to my next point. IRBs may be of better service to subjects if by design they had individuals who would have done studies on their boards. Imagine if the NAACP had no blacks on their boards there would be outrage. I think we should contact Paul and discuss a petition drive to put in place such a process. They dug in with programs such as VCT which I think is contemptuous of participants again getting back to fringe elements with lack regard that I hinted at. Its time we have expansive representation and I think Paul is well positioned to be an organizing force for the process.
|
|